UAR Publisher

Universal Academic Research Publisher

Socio-Economic and Developmental analysis of Indian-Administered and Pakistan-Administered Jammu & Kashmir: A Multi-Sectoral Perspective

Arshad Bhat, Amity Institute of Liberal Arts, Amity University Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.

Article historys:
Received: 08/02/2026
Accepted: 15/02/2026
Published: 20/02/2026

Page 1-24

ABSTRACT

The Jammu and Kashmir (J&K) region can be characterized as an area that is socio-economically and developmentally different from other areas because of the political partition and the different administrative frameworks. Through the use of secondary data sources such as Census data, The Economic Survey, and other government sources, as well as International Databases, this paper will use both descriptive statistics to show the regional disparities and complementarities across categories of demographics, agriculture, education, healthcare, and Financial Infrastructure, for both Indian administered Jammu & Kashmir (IAJ&K) and Pakistan administered Jammu & Kashmir (PAJ&K). The results show that, relative to PAJ&K, IAJ&K has more rural health coverage with respect to all healthcare dimensions and has developed extensive primary healthcare networks; it is highly diversified in its agriculture production with higher cropping intensity; and has a larger private education sector. In the case of PAJ&K, the average farm size per household is larger than in IAJ&K; most of the healthcare utilization occurs at hospitals; there are generally more ATMs per bank; and the teacher-student ratio for private schools is greater than in IAJ&K. However, PAJ&K continues to lag in infrastructure and availability of human resources. The rate of population growth, rate of literacy and per capita availability of resources are also indicative of systemic differences based on governance, policy interventions, and socio-political factors. According to the research outlined in this paper, context-specific policy approaches to address developmental deficits in politically sensitive and geographically complex areas will continue to be important. In addition to providing insight into how institutional frameworks and resource allocations impact human development outcomes in conflict regions by creating a unified comparative framework that pulls together multiple sectors, this study also highlights the importance of developing an inclusive and comprehensive strategy for specific geographical areas.

Keywords:

Comparative analysis, healthcare, education, agriculture, financial inclusion.

Scroll to Top